Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In a fraud and breach of contract case, Johnson & Bell Shareholders, Joseph R. Marconi and Victor J. Pioli, received a favorable defense verdict in federal court for their client, a seller of an airplane. The purchaser of the airplane had alleged claims for breach of contract and fraud on the grounds that the plane was riddled with defects that were known to the seller and not disclosed prior to the sale. The purchaser of the plane sought damages in excess of $2 million. The defense offered to settle the matter for $25,000 prior to trial, but the plaintiff asked for $2.5 million.

At trial, the defense argued that the plane contained no more defects than would be expected for a used airplane and that the plane was always in an airworthy condition as deemed by the Federal Aviation Administration. The plaintiff contended that the airplane was not airworthy and that the plane had a substantial damage history that was not disclosed by defendant. After seven days of trial, the jury found in favor of defendant on the fraud claim and awarded only $40,696 for breach of contract -- a favorable defense verdict for Johnson & Bell's client.

Related Items of Interest:

Appellate Court Reverses SJ Ruling Against Plaid Paisley Enterprises in Contribution, Breach of Contract Case

Fencl, McVisk and LeFevour Save Client $1.3M in Breach of Contract Insurance Dispute